spssforum.com from users, for users

SPSSforum.com is the largest free SPSS help resource worldwide.
On this SPSS forum you are sure to get an answer to your question!
Join the forum and let other SPSS users help you.

Join the SPSS users Group on LinkedIn
Join the SPSS Users Group
on LinkedIn
 
SPSSforum.com is a forum for SPSS users. Ask any question you like about SPSS or statistics.

It is currently Wed Sep 08, 2010 5:50 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Interaction in hierarchical regression with dichotomous var
PostPosted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 5:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 4:45 pm
Posts: 1
Hello,

I am relatively new to using regression methods, so please bear with me if this is a silly thing I am overlooking..

In my regression model, I have two predictor variables (X1, X2) and an interaction term (X1*X2). My dependent variable (Y) is a measure of of engagement; X1 is a continuous variable (working memory span) and X2 is a dichotomous variable (activity type; coded 1= high activity, 0=low activity).

I am trying to use SPSS to fit this model hierarchically so that in Step 1, I enter the main effects (Y= B0+B1X1+B2X2), and in Step 2, I enter the interaction effect (Y= B0+B1X1+B2X2+B3X1*X2).

As expected, In step one, neither of the main effects are significantly different from zero. Similarly, as expected, in step 2, the interaction term is significant. What is unexpected, and what I don't know how to explain, is that from step 1 to step 2, my X1 main effect (Working memory) goes from non-significant, to significant at the .01 level.

How do I interpret this finding, that adding the interaction term in step 2 changed the main effect from step 1 to 2? I don't think it is an issue of multicolinearity, my tolerance values were no less than .75.

Is my Beta weight for X1 the slope for the equation when activity type is low (=0), and it is significant? While B1+B3 would be my slope for the regression when activity type is high (=1), and that slope is also significant?

Thanks!


Top
 Profile  
 






Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
Template made by DEVPPL

This site is in no way connected with SPSS Inc. or any affiliate of SPPS Inc. The SPSS logo and products are owned by and copyrighted by SPSS Inc. The views expressed in the messages posted on this site are those of persons writing those comments and not necessarily those of the SPSSforum.com. SPSSforum.com does not vouch for the accuracy or truthfulness of any posted statement or opinion. The SPSSforum.com has, however, refrained from posting any item containing any statement known to be inaccurate, false or baseless.