SPSSforum.com is the largest free SPSS help resource worldwide.
On this SPSS forum you are sure to get an answer to your question!
Join the forum and let other SPSS users help you.
Post subject: a priori power analysis to determine sample size
Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2009 6:31 pm
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 3:10 am Posts: 5
Hi Dear Friends,
The design of my research is a within-subject 4-way anova. Each of the four independent within-subject variables has two levels. I need to do a priori power analysis to determine the appropriate sample size of the study. If power is set at 0.8, and effect size estimated at 0.5 (medium), what would be the appropriate sample size?
Post subject: Re: a priori power analysis to determine sample size
Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2009 5:33 pm
Moderator
Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 5:55 pm Posts: 555 Location: Belo Horizonte, Brasil
I'm not sure (never really used the program myself), but some work/college friends of mine said that NCSS PASS is really good for power and sample problems. But it isn't free...
_________________ BR
NOTE: "Please read the Posting Guidelines and always tell us your OS, the SPSS version and some information about your data!" - by statman.
Disponível em português (mas prefira inglês para que outros também entendam a solução).
Post subject: Re: a priori power analysis to determine sample size
Posted: Wed Feb 25, 2009 1:17 am
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 3:10 am Posts: 5
Hi Sasky, Fierce, Statman,
Grateful! Yes the way you showed me is the way to go. May I ask to have further advice? I feel I am just one step away from the solution. I have access to both PASS and G*Power. PASS accepts only 3 IVs (there are 4 in my research). G*Power appears user-friendly. However, I followed the link, for my design (ANOVA: Repeated Measures, within subject), the last four boxes on the left column are: "number of groups", "repetitions", "correlation among rep measures", "nonsphericity correction". To my understanding, nonsphericity is the violation of identically and independently distributed errors. It is inevitable when the repeated measures data are correlated to a large extent. Could I accept the default of G-power (1)? The default for "correlation among rep measures" is 0.5. Not sure what "number of groups" and "repetitions" mean. On-line help is not yet available for my design. Please advise.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum